PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND POPULAR PARTICIPATION
Abstract
The present work consists of an approach on popular participation in the area of public management. Brazil's 1988 Constitution brought mechanisms to democratize and also encourage effective popular participation in the public sector. With these new rules, Brazil ensures citizens' rights to participate effectively in government decision-making. To perform this research, criteria were used to search and select studies in databases that related the legal themes of public management and popular participation to better understand the analysis of this systemic review. It was concluded that even with all the information currently available on the internet, the population is still not well informed about their rights to participate in public management, often not even knowing their rights. The possibilities for participation increased significantly. However, it is necessary to increase citizen involvement in the social control of public management.
Downloads
References
DI PIETRO, Maria Sylvia Zanella. Direito administrativo. 18. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015.
FREIRE, Paulo. Ação cultural para a liberdade e outros escritos. 9. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2011.
ROCHA, José Cláudio. A participação popular na gestão pública no Brasil. Revista Jus Navigandi, Teresina, ano 16, n. 2886, 27 maio 2011. Disponível em: http://jus.com.br/artigos/19205. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2019.
VITALLE, Denise. Democracia e participação na gestão de políticas públicas: teoria e prática. Bahia Análise & Dados, Salvador, v. 17, n. 4, p. 1147-1154, jan./mar. 2018.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.