JUSPOSITIVISM UNDER THE VIEW OF HEBERT HART AND RONALD DWORKIN
Abstract
The discussion that evolve the Jusnaturalism and the Juspositivism is inspirated the reflections of jurists and philosophers. Although it is possible to affirm that many of the historical controversies associated with the confrontation between Positive Law and Natural Law have already been overcome, there are many aspects that deserve an academic dedication. Notwithstanding divergent opinions, which advocate the theoretical weakening of the subject, the passing of centuries demonstrates just the opposite, since it has not succeeded in eliminating the esteem of the thinkers for the theme developed. In this way, this article discusses Juspositivism under the view of Hebert Hart and Ronald Dworkin.
Downloads
References
BOBBIO, Norberto. O Positivismo Jurídico: lições de Filosofia do Direito. São Paulo: Ícone, 1995.
BUGALLO, Alejandro Alvarez. Teses Básicas do Positivismo e suas Críticas ao Jusnaturalismo. Lex Humana: revista do Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito da UCP, Petrópolis, n. 2, p. 1-39, 2009.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Levando os direitos a sério. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.
HART, Hebert L. A. O Conceito de Direito. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.
MARCONDES, Danilo; STRUCHINER, Noel. Textos básicos de Filosofia do Direito: de Platão a Frederick Schauer. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2015.
SGARBI, Adrian. Clássicos de Teoria do Direito. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2006.
STOLZ, Sheila. Um Modelo de Positivismo Jurídico: o pensamento de Herbert Hart. Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, v. 3, n. 11, p. 101-120, jan./jun. 2007. Disponível em: https://direitosp.fgv.br/sites/direitosp.fgv.br/files/rdgv_05_pp101-120.pdf.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
