CONSTITUTIONAL HERMENEUTICS
Abstract
The constitutional norms do not possess an exclusive legal content, due mainly to the fact that the Constitution is a text with a clear political feature. Therefore, we must conclude that the constitutional interpretation problems are broader and more complex than those regarding the ordinary law, this being the reason why the doctrine and the jurisprudence forged a framework of methods and principles to be handled by the interpreter when analyzing the constitutional text, a subject which will be developed on the current article.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. STF. Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 1.063/DF, Rel. Min. Celso de Mello, Tribunal Pleno, julgamento em 18 mai. 1994.
___________. STF. Agravo Regimental no Recurso Extraordinário nº 160.486/SP, Primeira Turma, Rel. Min. Celso de Mello, julgamento em 11 out. 1994.
___________. STF. Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 2.551/MG, Tribunal Pleno, Rel. Min. Celso de Mello, julgamento em 2 abr. 2003.
___________. STF. Embargos de Declaração no Recurso Extraordinário nº 328.812/AM, Tribunal Pleno, Rel. Min. Gilmar Mendes, julgamento em 6 mar. 2008.
___________. STF. Recurso Extraordinário nº 560.626/RS, Tribunal Pleno, Rel. Min. Gilmar Mendes, julgado em 12 jun. 2008.
___________. STF. Habeas Corpus nº 104.410/RS, Rel. Min. Gilmar Mendes, Segunda Turma, julgamento em 6 mar. 2012.
___________. STF. Reclamação nº 4.335/AC, Rel. Min. Gilmar Mendes, Tribunal Pleno, julgamento em 20 mar. 2014.
___________. STF. Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 5.136/DF, Tribunal Pleno, Rel. Min. Gilmar Mendes, julgamento em 1 jul. 2014.
___________. STF. Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 4.203/RJ, Tribunal Pleno, Rel. Min. Dias Toffoli, julgamento em 30 out. 2014.
___________. STF. Agravo Regimental no Recurso em Habeas Corpus nº 124.137/BA, Primeira Turma, Rel. Min. Luiz Fux, julgamento em 17 mai. 2016.
___________. STF. Habeas Corpus nº 124.306/RJ, Primeira Turma, voto-vista do Min. Roberto Barroso, julgamento em 29 nov. 2016.
CANOTILHO, J. J. Gomes. Direito Constitucional, Coimbra, Almedina, 1993.
___________. Direito Constitucional e Teoria da Constituição, 7ª ed., Coimbra, Almedina, 2003.
COELHO, Inocêncio Mártires. Interpretação Constitucional, 3ª ed., São Paulo, Saraiva, 2007.
GRAU, Eros Roberto. Ensaio e Discurso sobre a Interpretação – Aplicação do Direito, 3ª ed., São Paulo, Malheiros, 2005.
HÄBERLE, Peter. El Estado Constitucional, México, UNAM, 2001.
LENZA, Pedro. Direito Constitucional Esquematizado, 16ª ed., São Paulo, Saraiva, 2012.
MENDES, Gilmar Ferreira; COELHO, Inocêncio Mártires; BRANCO, Paulo Gustavo Gonet. Curso de Direito Constitucional, 5ª ed., São Paulo, Saraiva, 2010.
NOVELINO, Marcelo. Direito Constitucional, 3ª ed., São Paulo, Método, 2009.
OLIVEIRA, José Alfredo de. Teoria da Constituição, São Paulo, Resenha Universitária, 1979.
SCHIER, Paulo Ricardo. Filtragem Constitucional: Construindo uma Nova Dogmática Jurídica, 1ª ed., Porto Alegre, Sergio Antonio Fabris, 1999.
TEMER, Michel. Elementos de Direito Constitucional, 5a ed., São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 1989.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
