A FORGOTTEN MEMORY OF THE JUSTICE OF THE WORK OF PERNAMBUCO: "the case Eurico" (1966)
Abstract
The article's proposal is based on the study of a traumatic and forgotten memory of the Pernambuco Labor Court, which unfolds from a complaint that involved the crimes of “subversion” and “corruption”. This denunciation culminated in the removal of Eurico de Castro Chaves Filho from the post of President of Labor Court, in the years of 1966, whose circumstances were full of implications, only understood through the deepening of the authoritarian imagination that permeated the period. The narrative's path takes place through the work of interconnecting documentary artifacts of different natures. On the one hand, the Administrative Inquiry produced in the Labor Court, which generated another inquiry in the IV Army; and on the other, functional and individual records of the Department of Political and Social Order - DOPS-PE, which helped us to reveal the plot behind the fact that shook the history of the Regional Labor Court of the Sixth Region, in which it was possible to identify repressive practices constituted in both archival realities referring to the military period.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
