RURAL WORKER, PROUDLY: case study within the ambit of the federal court of maranhão
Abstract
This research was related to Citizen Justice, pointing to the Democratization of Justice axis. Proposed a case study on a lawsuit filed in a Federal Court of Maranhão. Such analysis characterized a pedagogical strategy raised for teaching about social security sickness aid, in the discipline of Social Security Practice. For this, the Vygotsky's cognitive theory was applied, which focuses on language to stimulate the teaching-learning process. An academic (University) and institutional (Federal Justice) dialogue was adopted to uncover the importance of the democratization of Justice, within the ambit of the Citizen Justice. Social security sickness aid was appreciated because it is currently the most demanded subject within the scope of the Federal Special Courts. It intended to investigate teaching through a problem; support a reflection on an experience; and verify teaching with research. It was an exploratory study, with a qualitative aspect; which used the bibliographic and documentary procedures, in addition to the use of the case study. It was noticed that the case study is prescribed by the pedagogical guidelines for Training and Improvement of Magistrates of the National School of Training and Improvement of Magistrates (ENFAM) and by the Political Pedagogical Project of the Federal Regional School of Magistrates of the 2nd Region (EMARF). It was also perceived that he case study consisted of the adequate methodology to develop the lessons related to sickness aid, in the Educational Practice of Social Security Practice. In the end, the case study worked the cognitive autonomy in the construction of knowledge, emphasizing the independence in the teaching-learning process, in the light of Vygotsky's theoretical conception.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. [Constituição (1988)]. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2020.
BRASIL. O uso de metodologias ativas colaborativas e a formação de competências. [Brasília, DF]: Ministério da Educação, 2020. Disponível em: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/implementacao/praticas/caderno-de-praticas/aprofundamentos/202-o-uso-de-metodologias-ativas-colaborativas-e-a-formacao-de-competencias-2. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2020.
BRASIL. Lei nº 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991. Dispõe sobre os Planos de Benefícios da Previdência Social e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1991. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8213cons.htm. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2020.
CINTRA, Carlos César Sousa; CAMURÇA, Eulália Emília Pinho; REIS, Ulisses Levy Silvério dos. O uso de novas tecnologias de informação e comunicação nas salas de aula da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal do Ceará: ferramentas agregadoras ou disruptivas do processo de ensino-aprendizagem? Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFC, Ceará, v. 37, n. 2, p. 405-422, 2017. Disponível em: http://periodicos.ufc.br/nomos/article/view/31060. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2020.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. Justiça em números 2019. Brasília, DF: CNJ, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.cnj.jus.br/pesquisas-judiciarias/justica-em-numeros/. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2020.
ESCOLA DA MAGISTRATURA REGIONAL FEDERAL DA 2ª REGIÃO. Projeto político pedagógico. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: EMARF, 2016. Disponível em: https://www10.trf2.jus.br/portal/emarf-portaria-institui-projeto-politico-pedagogico/. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2020.
ESCOLA NACIONAL DE FORMAÇÃO E APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE MAGISTRADOS. Diretrizes pedagógicas da ENFAM: para formação e aperfeiçoamento de magistrados. Brasília, DF: ENFAM, 2017. Disponível em: https://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/bitstream/2011/116264/Res_7_Enfam_2017_Diretrizes_Pedagogicas_Enfam%20_Texto_%20Principal.pdf. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2020.
FACHIN, Odilia. Fundamentos de metodologia. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2006.
FRASSON, Antonio Carlos; OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, Constantino Ribeiro de. Metodologia da pesquisa científica. São Luís: UemaNet, 2010.
LAKOMY, Ana Maria. Teorias cognitivas da aprendizagem. Curitiba: InterSaberes, 2014.
LAZZARI, J. B. Os juizados especiais como instrumento de acesso à justiça e de obtenção de um processo justo. Revista CEJ, Brasília, DF, ano 20, n. 70, p. 29-37, 2016. Disponível em: https://revistacej.cjf.jus.br/revcej/article/view/2164. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2020.
LEAL JÚNIOR, C. A. S. A linguagem, o texto e o juiz. Revista CEJ, Brasília, DF, ano 20, n. 68, p. 89-98, 2016. Disponível em: https://revistacej.cjf.jus.br/revcej/article/view/2057. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2020.
MENEZES, Olindo. Notas sobre o crime de redução a condição análoga à de escravo. Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1ª Região, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 3, p. 1-5, 2019. Acesso em: https://revista.trf1.jus.br/trf1/article/view/136. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2020.
NOBRE, Isabelle Rocha. Pedagogia dialógica de afeto e libertação: uma reflexão a partir da prática da professora Luana Tolentino. Lex Cult Revista do CCJF, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 3, p. 88-103, 2019. Disponível em: http://lexcultccjf.trf2.jus.br/index.php/LexCult/article/view/207. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2020.
NOGUEIRA, Makeliny Oliveira Gomes; LEAL, Daniela. Teorias da aprendizagem: um encontro entre os pensamentos filosófico, pedagógico e psicológico. Curitiba: InterSaberes, 2015.
PRODANOV, Cleber Cristiano; FREITAS, Ernani Cesar de. Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2013.
SANTOS, Elaine Cler Alexandre dos; BORGES, Pedro Pereira. Educação: pré-requisito para atuação no processo de mediação. Lex Cult Revista do CCJF, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 50-75, 2019. Disponível em: http://lexcultccjf.trf2.jus.br/index.php/LexCult/article/view/158. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2020.
SOUSA, Ana Kennya Félix Ribeiro de; SERRA, Ilka Márcia Ribeiro de Sousa. Metodologia da pesquisa e elaboração do trabalho de conclusão de curso. São Luís: UemaNet, 2011.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
