“HOW TO SAY US IF NOT AS AN ‘IF’, EQUAL TO EVERYONE AND NO ONE”
RETHINKING CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE LIGHT OF THE CONCEPT OF COMMUNITY
Abstract
This article seeks to carry out a theoretical investigation of the way in which the post-modernization of the global economy, in the last decades of the twentieth century, produced profound impacts on the forms of socio-political organization of human communities, causing, even, some seismic shocks in the state form as we know it. To think of our collective existence in terms of manifestations as a whole ordered for the common good, penetrated by manifestations of political power, requires us today, therefore, an effort to correct the understanding. It is necessary that we put the questions about society and the State back in a scenario in which a new concert of global forces requires that the economic, the political and the social overlap and complement each other in the production of wealth. Recognizing that such a reflection could open up infinite fronts of analysis and problematization, we aim, for the purposes of this article, at something more modest - it is our objective, from the reading of authors who somehow affirm the relational and dynamic nature of the collective subject, to rescue a form of our common existence that recovers its original sense of “community” which, we believe, allows the realization of human power in a complete way, beyond economic and political regulations.
Downloads
References
DELEUZE, Gilles. Lógica do sentido. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1974.
ESPOSITO, Roberto. Bíos: biopolítica e filosofia. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004.
ESPOSITO, Roberto. Communitas: origen y destino de la comunidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2003.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Ensayos sobre biopolítica: excesos de vida. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2009.
NANCY, Jean-Luc. Conloquium. In: ESPOSITO, Roberto. Communitas: origen y destino de la comunidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2003. p. 9-19.
NEGRI, Antonio. Trabalho de Dionísio: para a crítica ao estado pós-moderno. Juiz de Fora: Editora UFJF; Rio de Janeiro: Pazulin, 2004.
SÁ, Alexandre Franco de. Prefácio. In: ESPOSITO, Roberto. Bíos: biopolítica e filosofia. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004. p. 7-13.
SPINOZA, Baruchde. Ética. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2009.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.