THE FEMINICIDE AND COSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PURPOSE 181-A: THE FEMINIST CONQUER AND THE CONSERVATIVE BACKLASH
Abstract
This article discusses the legislative and jurisprudential advances of recent years in feminist agendas, as opposed to Proposed Constitutional Amendment 181A, authored by Congress man Tadeu Madulen, whose insertion of the original term of protection of life could hinder the debate on abortion in Brazil, as well as provoking numerous unconstitutional actions regarding the abortion possibilities of the Penal Code. Since the publication of the Maria da Penha Law in 2006, many other feminist guidelines have occupied not only the Parliament, but also the higher courts, giving rise to a plethora of summits and laws protecting women. At the end, a dialogue with the article by Márcia Tiburi, in which the author explains the forms of manifestation of the patriarchy, excluding the women from the debate.
Downloads
References
¬¬¬¬¬¬BRASIL. Lei nº 11.340, de 7 de agosto de 2006. Cria mecanismos para coibir a violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, nos termos do § 8º do art. 226 da Constituição Federal, da Convenção sobre a Eliminação de Todas as Formas de Discriminação contra as Mulheres e da Convenção Interamericana para Prevenir... Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2006/Lei/L11340.htm. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2019.
¬¬BOITEUX, Luciana. A legalização do abortoe o feminismo: amanhã vai ser outro dia. Folha de São Paulo, São Paulo, 8 jul. 2016.
PINTO; Andréia Soares; MORAES, Orlinda Cláudia R. de; MANSO, Flávia Vastano (Org.). Dossiê Mulher 2017. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Segurança Pública, 2017.
TIBURI, Márcia. O aborto e a bondade dos outros. Disponível em: http://www.marciatiburi.com.br/textos/oabortodosoutros.htm. Acesso em: 16 fev. 2018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
