REFLECTIONS ON THE NATURE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30749/2177-8337.v23n47p50-64

Abstract

The object of the present paper is on the nature of the criminal procedure. The objective is to demonstrate the importance of the theme and the study of this discipline in science of law, passing through the works of its major developers: Bülow, Goldschmidt and Fazzalari, revisiting the bibliography of these authors and other ones who wrote about the same theme.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALONSO, Pedro Aragoneses. Proceso y derecho procesal: introducción. 2. ed. Madrid: EDERSA, 1997.

BADARÓ, Gustavo Henrique. Processo penal. 3. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2015.

BECCARIA, Cesare. Dos delitos e das penas. Tradução: Paulo M. Oliveira. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2011.

BOBBIO, Norberto. Teoria da norma jurídica. 6. ed. São Paulo: EDIPRO, 2016.

BÜLOW, Oskar von. La teoria de las excepciones procesales y los presupuestos procesales. Tradução: Miguel Angel Rosas Lichtstein. Buenos Aires: EJEA, 1964.

COUTINHO, Jacinto Nelson de Miranda. Introdução aos princípios gerais do processo penal brasileiro. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFPR, Curitiba, ano 30, n. 30, p. 163-198, 1998.

DIAS, Jorge de Figueiredo. Questões fundamentais de direito penal revisitadas. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1999.

DIAS, Jorge de Figueiredo. Direito penal: parte geral, tomo I : questões fundamentais, a doutrina geral do crime. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2007.

FAZZALARI, Elio. Instituzioni di diritto processuale. Padova: CEDAM, 1975.

GAUER, Ruth Maria Chittó. A fundação da norma: para além da racionalidade histórica. Porto Alegre: EdiPUCRS, 2001.

GLOECKNER, Ricardo Jacobsen. Inaplicabilidade do conceito de ação ao processo penal. Revista sistema penal e violência, Porto Alegre, v. 3, n. 1, p. 47-61, 2011. Disponível em: http://repositorio.pucrs.br/dspace/bitstream/10923/11379/2/Inaplicabilidade_do_Conceito_de_Acao_ao_Processo_Penal.pdf. Acesso em: 22 set. 2019.

GLOECKNER, Ricardo Jacobsen. Uma nova teoria das nulidades: processo penal e instrumentalidade constitucional. 2010. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Paraná, 2010.

GOLDSCHMIDT, James. Principios generales del processo: teoria general del proceso. 2. ed. Buenos Aires: EJEA, 1961.

HAWKING, Stephen. Uma breve história do tempo. Tradução: Cássio de Arantes Leite. Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca, 2015.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. Raça e história. Tradução: Inácia Canelas. Lisboa: Editorial Presença: Martins Fontes, 1952. Disponível em: http://bit.ly/raca-e-historia-c-levi-strauss. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2019.

LOPES JÚNIOR, Aury. Direito processual penal. 12. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.

LOPES JÚNIOR, Aury. Fundamentos do processo penal: introdução crítica. 3. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.

PRIGOGINE, Ilya. O fim das certezas: tempo, caos e as leis da natureza. Tradução: Roberto Leal Ferreira. São Paulo: UNESP, 1996.

SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Um discurso sobre as ciências. 7. ed. Porto: Afrontamento, 1995.

TOURINHO FILHO, Fernando da Costa. Manual de processo penal. 9 ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2007.
Published
2020-04-08
How to Cite
JOHNER, Marcos Afonso; SALTIEL, Ramiro Gomes von. REFLECTIONS ON THE NATURE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Journal from the Judiciary Section of Rio de Janeiro, [S.l.], v. 23, n. 47, p. 50-64, apr. 2020. ISSN 2177-8337. Available at: <https://lexcultccjf.trf2.jus.br/index.php/revistasjrj/article/view/322>. Date accessed: 29 sep. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.30749/2177-8337.v23n47p50-64.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 23 No 47 (2019): Law and Jurisdiction
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.

Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.

Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.

The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.

The author is aware that:

a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;

b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.