THE TECHNIQUE OF EXPANSION OF COLLEGIATE IN THE NON UNANIMOUS JUDGMENT OF THE APPEAL AND THE ASSUMPTION OF JURISDICTION INCIDENT NUMBER 1 OF THE 2RD REGIONAL FEDERAL COURT
Abstract
The Law nº 13,105, of March 16th, 2015, which instituted the new Code of Civil Procedure, introduced into the legal system the technique of expansion of the collegiate, applicable in the judgments of the appeal, the interlocutory appeal and the rescissory action, the results of which are not unanimous, to replace the embargoes infringed. The main objective of this study is to analyze the understanding adopted by the Regional Court of the Second Region in the Assumption of Jurisdiction Incident nº 1, which narrowly interpreted the article 942 of the Civil Procedure Code, stating that the technical allusion, specifically in the judgment of the appeal, only takes place in the circumstances in which the majority asserts itself in the sense of the reform of the judgment on the merits. Regarding the structure, after the introduction, is examined the technique of collegial enlargement, its nature and its hypothesis. In the next chapter, the novel institute is analyzed in comparison with the infringing embargoes, appeal that was extinguished and replaced by the alluded judgment technique, examining the similarities and fundamental differences between them. Next, the thesis signed by the TRF of the 2nd Region in IAC Nº 1 is presented. The next chapter deals with the real scope of article 942, caput, of the CPC, bringing some understandings of the doctrine on the subject and, in conclusion, formulates a critical analysis of the understanding set in the referred precedent binding.
Downloads
References
BUENO, Cassio Scarpinella. Manual de Direito Processual Civil: Volume Único, 4ª ed., São Paulo : Saraiva Educação, 2018, Epub.
BUZAID, Alfredo. Ensaio para uma revisão do sistema de recursos no Código de Processo Civil. Estudos de direito. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1972, v. 1.
CÂMARA, Alexandre Freitas de. O Novo Processo Civil Brasileiro, 3ª ed. rev., atual. e ampl., ed. Atlas, São Paulo, 2017, livro eletrônico.
COÊLHO, Marcus Vinicius Furtado. Art. 942 – Técnica de Ampliação do Colegiado (https://www.migalhas.com.br/CPCMarcado/128,MI296489,91041-Art+942+do+CPC+Tecnica+de+ampliacao+do+colegiado – acessado em 09/03/2019.
COSTA, Eduardo José da Fonseca. Pequena história dos embargos infringentes no Brasil: uma viagem redonda. In: FREIRE, Alexandre; DANTAS, Bruno; NUNES, Dierle; DIDIER JR., Fredie; MEDINA, José Miguel Garcia; FUX, Luiz; CAMARGO, Luiz Henrique Volpe; OLIVEIRA, Pedro Miranda de (org.). Novas tendências do processo civil. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2014. v. 2.
CUNHA. Leonardo Carneiro da. A Fazenda Pública em Juízo, 14ª edição, ed. . rev., atual e ampl. - Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2017,
DIDIER, Fredie; CUNHA. Leonardo Carneiro da. Curso de Direito Processual Civil, vol. 3, Salvador: Ed. JusPodivm, 2019.
DONIZETTI, Elpídio. Novo Código de Processo Civil Comentado, 3ª edição revista, atualizada e ampliada, Editora Gen Atlas, 2017, ebook (livro eletrônico).
FILHO, Misael Montenegro. Novo Código de Processo Civil Comentado, 3ª ed. rev. e atual., ed. Atlas, São Paulo, 2018, livro eletrônico.
GAJARDONI, Fernando da Fonseca; DELLORE, Luiz; ROQUE, Andre Vasconcelos; OLIVEIRA JR, Zulmar Duarte de. Execução e Recursos Comentários ao CPC de 2015. Ed. Gen Método, 2ª ed. Revista e atualizada, ebook.
GONÇALVES, Marcus Vinicius Rios. Direito Processual Civil Esquematizado – 9ª ed. – São Paulo, Saraiva Educação, 2018, livro eletrônico.
MEDINA, José Miguel Garcia. Direito Processual Civil Moderno – 3ª ed. revista, atualizada e ampliada – São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 2017, livro eletrônico
NERY JR, Nelson e NERY, Rosa Maria de Andrade. Código de Processo Civil comentado, 3ª ed., São Paulo, Thomsom Reuters Brasil, 2018 (livro eletrônico).
NEVES, Daniel Assumpção Amorim. Manual de Direito Processual Civil, volume único, 10ª ed. Revista, atualizada e ampliada, editora JusPodivm, 2018.
RODRIGUES, Marcelo Abelha. Manual de Direito Processual Civil, 6ª ed. Revista, atualizada e ampliada, editora Forense, Rio de Janeiro, 2016, e-book.
TUCCI, José Rogério. Limites da devolução da matéria objeto da divergência no julgamento estendido – disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2017-jan-31/paradoxo-corte-limites-devolucao-materia-divergente-julgamento-estendido - acesso em 09/03/2019.
TUCCI, José Rogério Cruz; FILHO, Manoel Caetano Ferreira; APRIGLIANO, Ricardo de Carvalho; DOTTI, Rogéria Fagundes; MARTINS, Sandro Gilbert (coordenadores). Código de Processo Civil Anotado, OAB Paraná, AASP, Paraná, 2018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
